Posted by The Australian Financial Review on Saturday, September 15, 2019 04:20:10A green building station, which has been identified by the Australian government as a green infrastructure project, has attracted much controversy in Australia.
Green infrastructure projects have been a common feature of Australia’s infrastructure development agenda for decades.
They include public transport, roads and bridges, water supply and wastewater treatment, and even some urban development.
But green building stations are different.
They are small, often unproven, and they are often the result of poorly designed projects that often fail to deliver what is promised.
The government is now offering green building and environmental projects a “green” tag.
This marks the first time the tag has been applied to green infrastructure projects in Australia, following a push from the federal government to make them more “green”.
The government says the tag gives a green signal that the project is “green infrastructure that’s low cost and easy to deliver”.
“This tag will help guide governments to make the right decisions about projects that have been deemed green infrastructure by the Federal Government,” Environment Minister Greg Hunt said.
Green building and green infrastructure are not a new idea.
For example, Australia has been using the green building label since the 1980s.
However, this government’s tag for green infrastructure in Australia is significant because it marks the start of a shift in the way green building projects are viewed in the country.
This change has been driven by the federal Coalition’s push for green building, which the government says has the potential to save more than $1 trillion by 2030.
“The federal government is committed to developing green infrastructure across our economy to help people and businesses save money and create jobs and boost Australia’s competitiveness in the global economy,” Hunt said in a statement.
“We have seen the value of this green building sector in terms of reducing carbon emissions and improving energy security and resilience.”
This will be achieved through an infrastructure upgrade to improve efficiency, reduce carbon emissions, and create better green jobs and a brighter future.
“The tag is a recognition that green building infrastructure is a low-cost, low-risk investment that can make a real difference in the lives of the people who live, work and play in the Australian economy.”
Green building is a great way to create jobs, boost productivity and create wealth, so we have the resources to build green infrastructure,” Hunt added.
The federal Coalition government is also offering green buildings to help low-income households, particularly those in remote communities.
The $15,000 tag will only be available for “green building projects that are small and low cost”.
It will not be available to those who need a green building to achieve their environmental objectives.
In a statement, the Australian Energy Regulator said the tag was being applied to small, low cost green building construction.”
These projects are low cost, high quality and offer low-interest loans to those households that are not currently eligible for the green finance scheme,” the AER said.”
If a household does not qualify for the scheme then they can apply to be eligible for a green finance project.
“The AER also noted that green buildings will not have to meet any of the environmental standards of their built environment.”
They will be built according to the guidelines and specifications set out in the green financing framework, such as providing insulation, reducing the emissions from the building and installing green materials such as wood,” it said.
The AERS said the green funding scheme will help low income households save money on energy bills, and will reduce carbon dioxide emissions.”
Topics:environment,environmental-impact,environment-management,government-and-politics,business-economics-and/or-finance,government—state-issues,australiaFirst posted September 15, 2018 09:39:20More stories from Australia”
To be eligible, households will need to meet certain emission standards, and there are no additional requirements to meet emissions goals.”
Topics:environment,environmental-impact,environment-management,government-and-politics,business-economics-and/or-finance,government—state-issues,australiaFirst posted September 15, 2018 09:39:20More stories from Australia